Foreign and experience that is domestic assessing student’s success in universities and universities
The evaluation system in various nations has its own peculiarities. For example, in United states advanced schooling organizations assessment of students is carried call at credits. Each credit requires a one-hour (50 min.) lecture, a presentation at a seminar or participation in a(3-hour that is laboratory-practical class. In addition, pupils must spend a couple of hours on non-attendance training. Through the semester course (3 hours week that is per, 3 credits are credited for just two hours seminary classes, 3 credits for 2-3 hours laboratory lessons and another credit per semester.
Students just take exams from the core disciplines in the centre and also at the end of this semester. Evaluate understanding of the page system: A (“excellent”), B (“good”), C (“satisfactory”), B (“satisfactory with a” that is minus, E (“unsatisfactory”). In the event of “satisfactory by having a minus” the pupil is obliged to be controlled by the program once more and to pass the exam. The criterion of success is an semester score that is average. Students regarded as being pupil whom received 2 points and greater. The surname associated with pupil whom scored 3.5 points is entered when you look at the honorary listing of the dean’s office. Students who scored from 1.7 to 1.99 points gets a caution concerning the need certainly to improve performance, if he recovers this exact same score or from 1.1 to 1.7, then gets a significant caution. In case a pupil receives 1.1 points for a semester or has severe warnings and can not get a rating of 2, or when after warning gaining lower than 1.7 points, he’s taken faraway from the institution.
In Germany, students’ familiarity with higher education institutions is assessed for a system that is 5-point
Triumph can be defined in credits. One credit hour per semester means the pupil must work within one week of just one hour from this control. For the 4-year term, the pupil must earn 150-160 credits.
Italian universities have an interest in an operational system needless to say exams, which are accepted by commissions composed of three teachers, every one of that may put at the most 10 points. The defense of written theses or a draft in the front of the commission of 11 teachers is a exam that is final. The score that is total reach 110 points.
The integration of this higher education system in to the European academic area, the development of a credit-module system in degree institutions, a particular place yourwritersa�? when you look at the system of evaluation associated with the standard of expert training for the graduate, obliges each instructor to review the feeling of foreign and domestic advanced schooling, creatively put it to use inside the practical task.
The score system of assessment of knowledge mainly activates the pupil’s separate work, causes it to be rhythmic and systematic throughout the semester; better educated and cognitive activity is inspired, the role of advertising autonomy, initiative, responsibility, imagination in academic and cognitive activity increases; the objectivity regarding the evaluation is increased, very nearly totally unrelated towards the successful or unsuccessful reply to the score or exam; the mental anxiety throughout the test decreases notably. In addition, it allows the instructor to individualize learning and an approach that is differentiated students, plays a role in the logical construction regarding the student through the semester, specially through the exam sessions.
Utilization of the score system of evaluation within the academic process eliminates the biased way of the assessment of students’ knowledge; will act as a fruitful method of encouraging academic and cognitive task; raises the student’s responsibility for learning outcomes; encourages the utilization of the principle of individualization of training; eliminates the problem of attending classes; frees the pupil time for classes by interests; the spirit of cooperation prevails into the audience, the teacher ceases to be always a supervisor, and so on.
Consequently, the trainer must think carefully and artistically to put on the criteria and norms for evaluating the knowledge, abilities and abilities of students. It must be guided because of the medical axioms of this methodology of academic work, attentively apply to each student, taking into consideration his inclinations, interests and aspirations, to demonstrate principles that are high tact.